Nobody can state the ROI, so nobody can defend the price
A company that cannot express what its product is worth in the customer's own numbers will discount under pressure, lose renewals it should win, and never raise prices. This is one of the most tractable problems in the first hundred days after an acquisition.

Ask a software company what its product is worth to a customer. The weak answer is a list of features. The average answer is a category claim: we save time, we reduce risk, we improve efficiency. The strong answer is a number in the customer’s own units, with the customer’s own name attached to it.
Most companies at this size give the average answer, and it costs them in three places at once.
Where it shows up
In discounting. A representative who cannot articulate value has one lever left when a buyer pushes on price. Discount discipline is the cleanest measurable symptom of this problem, and it is visible in the billing data long before anyone admits it in a meeting.
In renewals. A renewal conversation with no quantified value is a budget conversation, and budget conversations in a tight year go badly. The retention data reflects the environment: median gross revenue retention fell from 88 percent to 84 percent between 2024 and 2025 across the 342 companies in the Aleph and Benchmarkit sample, and the decline reached every quartile, which reads as a market-level shift rather than an execution failure at any one company. In that environment, being unable to state a number is more expensive than it used to be.
In pricing. Nobody raises prices on a value proposition they cannot express. The price stays where it was set, usually years earlier, usually by intuition.
Why this is a post-close job rather than a diligence finding
You can identify the problem in diligence. You cannot fix it there, because fixing it requires talking to customers as their vendor rather than as a prospective buyer, and it requires changing what the sales team says, which is not something a diligence provider gets to do.
After close it becomes tractable quickly, and it is unusually good value for the effort. The raw material already exists inside the company: customers who have renewed repeatedly and can say why, support tickets that show which workflows actually get used, and win and loss records that show which arguments moved a deal.
The work is turning that into a value model the sales team can carry into a room. What the customer measured before, what they measure now, and the delta expressed in their units rather than yours. Then testing it in live calls and correcting it, which is the part most companies skip.
What changes when it lands
Discounting becomes a decision rather than a reflex. Renewals stop being budget conversations. And pricing becomes movable, which matters because the next article in this series is about what happens to companies whose pricing was designed for a market that no longer exists.
More teardowns
Pricing built before the market changed
Most software companies at this size price per seat, on a model set years ago. Buyers increasingly want to pay for consumption or for outcomes, and investors increasingly prefer it. Moving is valuable and moving carelessly transfers real risk onto the vendor.
The ARR that is not ARR
Reported ARR routinely includes one-year cancellable contracts, implementation and services revenue, and one-off fees. Each is real revenue and none of it is recurring in the sense a multiple implies. Reconstructing the recurring base from source data is usually the single largest price mover in a software deal.
Last updated

